I was out of the office for the last two trading days, and while I found the beginning-of-year movements to be relatively unsurprising, I did find this morning’s activity to be curious – at least for a few minutes. Then the usual reality kicked in. It’s not about fiscal policy, it’s still about Nvidia (NVDA) and FOMO. Enthusiasm about Jensen Huang’s address to the Consumer Electronics Show outweighed political considerations.
Judging from my crowded flights on Wednesday and yesterday, it was obvious that not everyone was back at work last week after the calendar turned. Thus, on Thursday the market seemed to trade as if it had a hangover, and on Friday we had the all-too-common end-of-week surge (I’m going with Friday Follies as a nickname, though I’m open to suggestions) when light volume intersects with hundreds of expiring weekly options. From my vantage point, that appeared to be the reason that Friday’s move continued to accelerate throughout the day on lighter- than-normal volume. There were bargains to be hunted and plenty of expiring strikes for stocks and indices to act as slingshots for a concerted up move after a relatively long and disappointing downdraft.
When I woke up this morning, I was originally surprised to see overnight futures continuing the rally rather than showing some profit-taking. But that was before I saw the Washington Post article reporting that the incoming President would be leaning towards tariffs applied to every country but targeted to strategic industries. Many investors are concerned that broad-based tariffs could be inflationary, so it is understandable why a more limited approach to then would be considered market friendly.
But just before the market opened, we learned that the rally was not really about tariffs after all. President-elect Trump refuted the article on Truth Social at 9:15 EST:
If traders were truly enthused about the potential changes to the tariff policy, then stocks should have given back a significant piece of their pre-market gains. But they didn’t, and the rally accelerated shortly thereafter. It seems logical to conclude that this morning’s move was never about tariffs. The following charts tell more of the story:
Source: Interactive Brokers
Past performance is not indicative of future results
Frankly, it’s not every day that we see a major stock rally by more than 10% in two sessions. Considering that NVDA sports a market capitalization of roughly $3.7 trillion, investors seem to have decided that Huang’s comments will be worth about $370 billion to the value of the company he manages. But we know that’s not really how investors are thinking. One of the stocks that dominate market psychology broke out of a short-term trading range on Friday and is now flirting with all-time highs. No one wants to miss a move like that – at least in an environment where FOMO is a persistent theme. So up we went, with megacap stocks once again leading the rally.
We’ll find out after 6:30 PST whether the current move in NVDA is a “buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news” event. Remember, that type of reaction is less about the company itself than the market’s anticipation for the event in question. Expectations are clearly rosy, and considering Huang’s propensity for positive messaging, that seems justified. “How rosy” or “too rosy” is the question that will be resolved tonight. Stay tuned tomorrow, and in the meantime, perhaps take advantage of the below-16 VIX. It strikes me that the least likely CES outcome will be a snooze; thus with NVDA once again taking the market’s lead, some sort of broad reaction seems probable.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
Disclosure: ETFs
Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
Disclosure: Options Trading
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. For information on the uses and risks of options read the "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options" also known as the options disclosure document (ODD). Multiple leg strategies, including spreads, will incur multiple transaction costs.
Disclosure: Futures Trading
Futures are not suitable for all investors. The amount you may lose may be greater than your initial investment. Before trading futures, please read the CFTC Risk Disclosure. A copy and additional information are available at the Warnings and Disclosures section of your local Interactive Brokers website.
Join The Conversation
If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs page. go to: IBKR Ireland FAQs or IBKR U.K. FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services: IBKR Ireland or IBKR U.K..
Visit IBKR U.K. Open an IBKR U.K. Account