This morning we had two relatively significant pieces of news from Asia, neither of which are affecting US equity markets much, if at all. The latter piece, the South Korean President\u2019s declaration of martial law, came as quite a surprise; the former, China\u2019s ban on rare mineral exports to US chipmakers was less of a surprise, but almost certainly more meaningful to US companies. The reaction seems to be quite ho-hum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The South Korea news certainly came as a surprise.\u00a0 There is always an extra degree of risk in that country because of its recalcitrant neighbor, but I don’t know that anyone had “martial law” on their bingo card for today.\u00a0 We saw a nearly immediate 3% drop in the won (KRW), but the damage seemed limited to that specific currency.\u00a0 We never saw much of a \u201cflight to safety\u201d bid in US Treasuries, so it tells me that the news isn’t resonating much with global investors.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From a US stocks point of view, we are (so far) seeing nothing unusual in equities other than some normal profit taking. The activity in the S&P 500 (SPX) is almost the mirror image of yesterday, when stocks meandered with modest gains. That said, the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) is holding onto almost all of yesterday\u2019s tech-fueled 1% rally, while is only down about \u00bd% after yesterday\u2019s 2.6% leap . It seems that once again US equity investors are demonstrating their ability to tune out inconvenient geopolitical news \u2013 even if China’s export ban on semiconductor materials might affect some of their favorite companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One might have thought that China\u2019s export ban on minerals such as gallium, germanium, and other raw materials that are used in chips, RFID, and LEDs might have led to a more negative response. This was China\u2019s latest move in an ongoing tit-for-tat trade war over the strategically important semiconductor sector. On Monday afternoon, the Biden administration announced new restrictions on advanced memory chips and chipmaking equipment. That news didn\u2019t affect the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) which rose about 2.6% yesterday, so, if the market was able to shrug off that story yesterday, why shouldn\u2019t it shrug off the next facet today? <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Some of today\u2019s ban had been factored in already, since prices for the strategic minerals had already risen dramatically in advance of the most recent news. Yet investors do seem rather blas\u00e9 about the ongoing trade war in this key market sector. It is of course possible to expect the tensions to improve with the new administration, but the rhetoric so far suggests otherwise. Is this a case of investors perceiving the latest salvos to be part of the new normal, or is it a sign of complacency? Remember, equity investors usually have a difficult time assessing geopolitical risks unless they directly affect things like revenues, earnings, cash flows and the like \u2013 the things that directly affect a stock\u2019s valuation. The semiconductor trade skirmish should indeed impact some of those factors for a key industry. Decide whether they merit your attention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This morning we had two relatively significant pieces of news from Asia, neither of which are affecting US equity markets much, if at all. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11299,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[145,146,147,8,12,153,148,7],"tags":[],"contributors-categories":[149],"class_list":{"0":"post-200451","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ibkr-market-insights","8":"category-macro","9":"category-north-america","10":"category-region","11":"category-securities","12":"category-stocks","13":"category-text-articles","14":"category-traders-insight","15":"contributors-categories-interactive-brokers"},"pp_statuses_selecting_workflow":false,"pp_workflow_action":"current","pp_status_selection":"publish","acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n